MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041649839 · doi:10.1021/ic901442e

Structural Motifs and Biological Studies of New Antimony(III) Iodide Complexes with Thiones

2009· article· en· W2041649839 on OpenAlex
İ.İ. Öztürk, S. I. Filimonova, S.K. Hadjikakou, N. Kourkoumelis, V. Dokorou, Manolis J. Manos, Anastasios J. Tasiopoulos, Mădălina M. Bârsan, Ian S. Butler, Е. Р. Милаева, Jan Balzarini, Nick Hadjiliadis

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMetal complexes synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryThioamideIodideDimerMonomerCrystallographyIntramolecular forceOctahedronAntimonyRaman spectroscopyOctahedral molecular geometrySquare pyramidal molecular geometryThioetherTrigonal bipyramidal molecular geometryCrystal structureStereochemistryInorganic chemistryPolymerOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eight new antimony(III) iodide complexes of the heterocyclic thioamides, 2-mercapto-1-methylimidazole (MMI), 2-mercaptobenzimidazole (MBZIM), 5-ethoxy-2-mercaptobenzimidazole (EtMBZIM), 2-mercaptothiazolidine (MTZD), 3-methyl-2-mercaptobenzothiazole (NMeMBZT), 2-mercapto-3,4,5,6-tetrahydropyrimidine (tHPMT), 2-mercaptopyridine (PYT), and 2-mercaptopyrimidine (PMT) of formulas {[SbI(3)(MMI)(2)].MeOH} (1), [SbI(3)(MBZIM)(2)] (2), {[SbI(2)(mu(2)-I)(EtMBZIM)(2)](2).H(2)O} (3), [SbI(3)(MTZD)] (4), [(NMeMBZT)SbI(2)(mu(2)-I)(2)(mu(2)-S-NMeMBZT)SbI(2) (NMeMBZT)] (5), {[SbI(3)(tHPMT)(3)].MeOH} (6), [SbI(3)(PYT)] (7), and [SbI(3)(PMT)(2)] (8), have been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, FT-IR spectroscopy, FT-Raman spectroscopy, and TG-DTA analysis. The crystal structures of 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 were also determined by X-ray diffraction. The complexes show interesting structural motifs. Complex 6 is a monomer, with octahedral (Oh) geometry around the metal ion formed by three sulfur and three iodide atoms. Complexes 3 and 5 are dimers, with a square pyramidal (SP) geometry in each monomeric unit, while complexes 4 and 7 are polymers with pseudotrigonal bipyramidal (psi-TBP). Two or three sulfur atoms from thioamide ligands and three iodide atoms are bound to Sb atoms forming building blocks for the dimers and polymers. Strong intramolecular interactions between mu(2)-I and/or mu(2)-S and Sb atoms stabilize both structures. In dimer complex 5, two terminal iodide and one terminal sulfur atom are bonded to the Sb ion, while two mu(2)-I and one mu(2)-S bridging atoms bridge the metal ions forming psi-Oh geometry. Computational studies using multivariant linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural networks (ANN) and considering biological results (50% inhibitory concentration, IC(50)) as dependent variables derived a theoretical equation for IC(50) values of the complexes studied. The calculated IC(50) values are compared satisfactorily with the experimental inhibitory activity of the complexes measured. Complexes 3-7 were used to study their influence upon the catalytic peroxidation of linoleic acid by the enzyme Lipoxygenase (LOX). Compounds 1-8 were also tested for in vitro cytotoxicity, and they showed mostly a moderate cytostatic activity against a variety of tumor cell lines but comparable with those found for the antimony(III) chloride and bromide complexes, reported earlier [Ozturk et al. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 2861-2866; Ozturk et al. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 2233-2245].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it