MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041676030 · doi:10.1002/marc.200900698

The Advantages of In Situ Surfactant Generation for Miniemulsions

2010· article· en· W2041676030 on OpenAlex
Ula El‐Jaby, Michael F. Cunningham, Timothy F. L. McKenna

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Rapid Communications · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSurfactants and Colloidal Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulmonary surfactantIn situMaterials scienceNucleationMiniemulsionChemical engineeringEmulsionPhase (matter)ChemistryOrganic chemistryComposite materialPolymerPolymerization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The stabilisation of miniemulsions using an in situ generated surfactant is presented. This surfactant, prepared from of a water-soluble base and an oil-soluble long chain acid was successfully used to create stable miniemulsions with up to 60 vol.-% organic phase. It is shown that the creation of a surface active species at the oil-water interface allowed stable miniemulsions to be generated more rapidly than when using conventional surfactant. In addition, polymerised miniemulsions exhibited less secondary nucleation when in situ surfactants were used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it