MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041725454 · doi:10.1016/j.femsle.2005.01.001

Assessment of a new technique combining a viability test, whole-cell hybridization and laser-scanning cytometry for the direct counting of viable Enterobacteriaceae cells in drinking water

2005· article· en· W2041725454 on OpenAlexafffund
Julia Baudart, Amandine Olaizola, Josée Coallier, Vincent Gauthier, Patrick Laurent

Bibliographic record

VenueFEMS Microbiology Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFecal contamination and water quality
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalPolytechnique MontréalNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Water Network
KeywordsEnterobacteriaceaeEnumerationMicrobiologyFlow cytometryCytometryFish <Actinopterygii>BiologyMolecular biologyEscherichia coliFisheryBiochemistryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new direct approach, called direct viable count (DVC)-FISH-ScanRDI, combining viability measurement, specific detection and sensitive enumeration of highly diluted Enterobacteriaceae cells, was assessed during the summer in water samples from a North American drinking water treatment plant and its distribution system. Major results of this field investigation show a higher sensitivity of the DVC-FISH-ScanRDI approach in enumerating viable Enterobacteriaceae cells in distributed drinking water, relative to a culture-based method, and the increased concentration of viable but non-culturable (VBNC) Enterobacteriaceae cells in distributed water for temperatures above 18 degrees C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEMS Microbiology LettersSame topicFecal contamination and water qualityFrench-language works237,207