Distribution of late instar <i>Lymantria dispar</i> cadavers killed by <i>Entomophaga maimaiga</i> on trunks of several tree species in southwestern Japan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Attachment of late-instar Lymantria dispar L. (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) cadavers killed by Entomophaga maimaiga Humber, Shimazu et Soper (Zygomycetes: Entomophthorales) on trunks of five dominant tree species was determined in a broadleaf forest in southwestern Japan. The highest numbers of cadavers were found attached to the trunk of Pasania glabra (Thunb.) Oerst., while there were moderate numbers of cadavers on the trunks of Quercus glauca Thunb. and Quercus serrata Thunb. and no cadavers were found attached to trunks of Ilex pedunculosa Miq. and Clethra barbinervis Sieb. et Zucc.. All examined cadavers contained E. maimaiga resting spores. The differences in cadaver attachment among tree species may influence density of E. maimaiga resting spores around tree bases, which act as reservoirs for fungal survival during unfavorable periods or over numerous years. Our results provide important information as to where to collect E. maimaiga resting spores for biological control of L. dispar, especially in forests containing many tree species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".