Energy Absorption of Seated Body Exposed to Single and Three-Axis Whole Body Vibration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The absorbed power characteristics of seated body exposed to whole-body vibration along the individual and combined fore-aft ( x), lateral ( y) and vertical (z) axes are investigated through measurements of body-seat interactions at the two driving-points formed by the body and the seat-pan, and upper body and the seat backrest. The experiments involved two levels of back support (no back support and vertical backrest) and two levels of broad-band vibration with nearly constant acceleration power spectral density in the 0.5–20 Hz frequency range applied along the individual x-, y- and z- axis (0.25 and 0.4 m/s 2 rms acceleration), and along the three-axis (0.23 and 0.4 m/s 2 rms acceleration along each axis). The biodynamic responses, measured at the seat-pan and the backrest are applied to characterize the total seated body's energy transfer along each axis. Furthermore, an alternative frequency response function method H v is employed to capture the coupling in the seated body responses to uncorrelated multi-axis vibration. The total vibration absorbed power responses to simultaneous x, y and z –axis vibration are subsequently derived as the summation of vibration absorbed power along the individual axis within each one-third frequency band. The mean responses measured at the seat-pan suggest strong effects of the back support, and the direction and magnitude of vibration. The total vibration power absorbed by the seated body is further estimated under a multi-axis vibration environment of four different work vehicles. The results suggest that total average power absorbed under reported vehicular vibration varies with the effective acceleration in a nearly quadratic manner.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".