Dopamine D2 and D3 receptors in human putamen, caudate nucleus, and globus pallidus
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Because radioactive raclopride and radioactive (+)-4-propyl-9-hydroxynaphthoxazine ((+)-PHNO) are used to image dopamine (DA) D2 and D3 receptors in the striatum and globus pallidus in humans, the present study examined the proportions of D2 and D3 receptors in postmortem tissues from these regions. Conflicting results were obtained when using a single concentration of remoxipride to occlude D2 receptors or using a single concentration of U99194A or FAUC 365 to occlude D3 receptors. However, using a range of concentrations of FAUC 365, a D3-selective antagonist, to inhibit the binding [(3)H]raclopride or [(3)H]-(+)-PHNO to D3 receptors at low concentrations (1-10 nM) and to inhibit ligand binding to D2 receptors at higher concentrations (100-2000 nM), it was possible to measure the proportion of D2 and D3 receptors in the tissues. This method revealed that these two radioligands detected only D2 receptors in the dorsal putamen and the dorsal caudate nucleus, but detected a mixed population of two-thirds D2 and one-third D3 DA receptors in the ventral putamen, the ventral caudate, and the globus pallidus. The present findings are in good agreement with the known gene expression data for D2 and D3 receptors in these human brain regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it