Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the past twenty years, graft and corruption in China's official circles have spread like a prairie fire to all corners of the country and have become a cancer in the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP's) organism—a cancer that will be virtually impossible to eradicate. "All those in charge of money embezzle, and all those with power take bribes." In the land of China, two-thirds of those involved in major economic crimes are members of the Communist Party, many of them highly-placed, powerful government officials. Sycophantic underlings ride roughshod over the people, and society's moral degeneration is becoming worse by the day. There is a doggerel that goes like this: "Abroad, there is Jianada (Canada); in China, it is dajia na (everyone takes); if you don't demand [bribes], you'll get nothing for it; if you're not on the take, your honesty is wasted." The prestige of the Communist Party declines with each passing year, and each Central Committee commands less authority than its predecessor. The "Four Basic Principles" have been picturesquely reworded by the general public and renamed the "New Four Basic Principles," under which communist officials allegedly "basically rely on tributes for food and drink; basically depend on gifts for cigarettes and liquor; basically do not use their own salaries; and basically do not touch their own wives." This gives one a general idea of the current situation in official circles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".