MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041779202 · doi:10.5539/ass.v11n9p43

Chinese Art within Thai Temples in Malaysia: The Disappearance of Thai Art

2015· article· en· W2041779202 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Punya Tepsing

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian Studies and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSculptureGautama BuddhaChinese artIdentity (music)State (computer science)Chinese cultureArtVisual artsAncient historyHistoryBuddhismChinaAestheticsArchaeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The identity of Thai temples in Malaysia is disappearing, as the temples display more Chinese art than Thai.Thus, this research aims to investigate the patterns in Chinese art and the conditions that support the appearanceof Chinese art within Thai temples. Chinese art appears within these temples in their sculptures of Buddha,pavilions, and walls. The conditions supporting the appearance of Chinese art include 1) the need for funds toconstruct new temples; 2) the abilities of pastors who can speak Chinese and English and are interested in artfrom various countries; and 3) the eastern coast of Malaysia being a place where many people of Chinesedescent settled. Chinese people were not able to purchase land easily due to state laws; thus, they had to use Thaitemples as places to preserve their identity by constructing Chinese art within the temple.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social ScienceSame topicAsian Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207