MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041782372 · doi:10.1080/2150704x.2014.960611

Multilook polarimetric SAR data probability density function estimation using a generalized form of multivariate K-distribution

2014· article· en· W2041782372 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing Letters · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnivariateWishart distributionProbability density functionMultivariate statisticsMathematicsK-distributionSynthetic aperture radarCovariance matrixCovarianceUnivariate distributionMultivariate normal distributionProbability distributionCumulative distribution functionStatisticsComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In our previous work, the probability density function (pdf) of single-channel synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data was modelled as a generalized form of the univariate K-distribution in order to incorporate higher order moments in the pdf estimation. In this paper, we extend this univariate model to the multivariate case, the objective being the sample covariance matrix pdf estimation of multilook polarimetric SAR data. Applying the product model, and assuming the texture distribution as the Laguerre expansion of the gamma distribution, we derive this pdf, which is a generalized form of the well-known multivariate K-distribution. The resulting distributions are assessed quantitatively with respect to multilook fully polarimetric L-band SAR image data from which we conclude that the proposed pdf demonstrates an improved goodness of fit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.751

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it