MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041798143 · doi:10.3188/szf.2001.0377

The use of fire in the environmental rehabilitation on the sites of a former refugee camp at Benaco, Tanzania

2001· article· en· W2041798143 on OpenAlexaff
Urs Bloesch

Bibliographic record

VenueSchweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwesen · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAfrican Botany and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsMitel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTanzaniaDry seasonEndangered speciesRefugeeGeographyAgroforestryRegeneration (biology)Natural regenerationForestryEnvironmental protectionEnvironmental scienceEcologyHabitatArchaeologyBiologyEnvironmental planningCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The enormous wood requirements of about 450 000 Rwandan refugees in northwestern Tanzania led to the depletion of the wood resources in the surrounding savannas in an area of about 500 km2. The natural regeneration of the woody plants was endangered by frequent fierce late dry-season fires. Since total fire exclusion of the vast area was not feasible, early-burning was prescribed which is less destructive to woody regeneration than the hotter late burns and which prevents the more destructive late dry-season fires. The techniques of controlled burning are explained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSchweizerische Zeitschrift fur ForstwesenSame topicAfrican Botany and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207