MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041808434 · doi:10.1049/el:20082239

Low-complexity 8×8 transform for image compression

2008· article· en· W2041808434 on OpenAlexaff
Saad Bouguezel, M. Omair Ahmad, M.N.S. Swamy

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics Letters · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Filter Design and Implementation
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscrete cosine transformImage compressionTransform codingDiscrete sine transformAlgorithmModified discrete cosine transformDiscrete Hartley transformData compressionMathematicsCompression (physics)Discrete Fourier transform (general)Lapped transformComputationMatrix (chemical analysis)Reduction (mathematics)S transformImage (mathematics)ArithmeticComputer scienceFractional Fourier transformImage processingComputer visionFourier transformWavelet transformMathematical analysisDiscrete wavelet transformMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An efficient 8×8 sparse orthogonal transform matrix is proposed for image compression by appropriately introducing some zeros in the 8×8 signed discrete cosine transform (SDCT) matrix. An algorithm for its fast computation is also developed. It is shown that the proposed transform provides a 25% reduction in the number of arithmetic operations with a performance in image compression that is much superior to that of the SDCT and comparable to that of the approximated discrete cosine transform.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations103
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronics LettersSame topicDigital Filter Design and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207