MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041810081 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.86.034313

Photoresponse of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mrow/><mml:mn>76</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math>Se below 9 MeV

2012· article· lv· W2041810081 on OpenAlexaff
N. Cooper, F. Reichel, V. Werner, L. Bettermann, Babak Alikhani, S. Aslanidou, C. Bauer, L. Coquard, M. Fritzsche, Y. Fritzsche, J. Glorius, P. Goddard, T. Möller, N. Pietralla, M. Reese, C. Romig, D. Savran, L. Schnorrenberger, Felix Siebenhühner, V. V. Simon, K. Sonnabend, M. K. Smith, C. Walz, S. W. Yates, O. Yevetska, M. Zweidinger

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review C · 2012
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsExtrapolationPhysicsScatteringBremsstrahlungAtomic physicsPhotonQuantum mechanicsStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dipole strength distribution of ${}^{76}$Se has been investigated via photon scattering in the energy region below 9 MeV utilizing bremsstrahlung produced at the S-DALINAC facility at the TU Darmstadt. About 0.20(1)% of the classical $E1$ sum rule is exhausted by observed $J=1$ states of justifiably assumed negative parity. An extrapolation of the GDR below 9 MeV suggests that considerable strength may remain unobserved due to background, finite detector resolution, and fragmentation. The observed strength thus represents a lower limit. Candidates for the ${2}_{1,ms}^{+}$ state and a fragment of the ${1}_{s}^{+}c$ mixed-symmetry states are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207