MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041811929 · doi:10.2135/cropsci2007.08.0480

Genetic Mapping of the Wheat Leaf Rust Resistance Gene <i>Lr60</i> (<i>LrW2</i>)

2008· article· en· W2041811929 on OpenAlexafffund
Colin W. Hiebert, Julian B. Thomas, Brent McCallum, Daryl J. Somers

Bibliographic record

VenueCrop Science · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersSolar Energy Technologies OfficeAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWestern Grains Research Foundation
KeywordsBiologyHybridMicrosatelliteCultivarGeneticsPloidyWheat leaf rustPopulationRust (programming language)Plant disease resistanceGenetic diversityAlleleGeneBotanyVirulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leaf rust (caused by Puccinia triticina Eriks.) is an important disease of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) in North America. This study was conducted to assess the utility of the uncharacterized resistance gene Lr60 (formerly LrW2 ) for the development of resistant cultivars by demonstrating its novelty, genetic location, and the breadth of resistance that it confers. Haploids of a single gene line carrying Lr60 (RL6172) were pollinated with a susceptible cultivar to generate hybrids with random chromosome deficiencies arising from irregular meiosis of the haploid. Out of 488 hybrids, four were susceptible to leaf rust. All susceptible hybrids lacked several polymorphic microsatellite alleles from RL6172 that are specific to chromosome 1D. Analysis of an F 2 population confirmed that Lr60 was located on the short arm of 1D, 8.4 cM distal to the microsatellite BARC149. Since Lr21 is also located on 1DS a cross was made between single gene lines of Lr21 and Lr60 ; five susceptible plants recovered in F 2 out of 1141 individuals tested were confirmed with progeny tests. This ratio (5:1136) gives an estimated recombination frequency of 13% between Lr21 and Lr60 RL6172 was tested with 37 isolates of P. triticina , encompassing a diversity of virulence found in North America; one isolate was virulent. Lr60 is a novel resistance gene and represents a useful diversification of the genetic resources available in wheat for development of leaf rust resistant cultivars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.742
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrop ScienceSame topicWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyFrench-language works237,207