MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The electronic structure of lithium metagallate

2011· article· en· W2041826951 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Condensed Matter · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicZnO doping and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Light Source
KeywordsElectronic structureHeterojunctionDensity functional theoryValence (chemistry)Band gapSpectral lineLithium (medication)Condensed matter physicsAb initioConduction bandMaterials scienceElectronElectronic band structureSpectroscopySemimetalMolecular physicsAtomic physicsChemistryPhysicsComputational chemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Herein we present a study of the electronic structure of lithium metagallate (LiGaO(2)), a material of interest in the field of optoelectronics. We use soft x-ray spectroscopy to probe the electronic structure of both the valence and conduction bands and compare our measurements to ab initio density functional theory calculations. We use several different exchange-correlation functionals, but find that no single theoretical approach used herein accurately quantifies both the band gap and the Ga 3d(10) states in LiGaO(2). We derive a band gap of 5.6 eV, and characterize electron hybridization in both the valence and conduction bands. Our study of the x-ray spectra may prove useful in analysing spectra from more complicated LiGaO(2) heterostructures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.576

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it