Water-borne conidia of aquatic hyphomycetes: seasonal and yearly patterns in Catamaran Brook, New Brunswick, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over a period of 5 years, monthly samples of water-borne conidia were collected at two sites, bridge and mouth, in Catamaran Brook, a third-order salmon stream in New Brunswick, Canada. Conidial concentrations and number of aquatic hyphomycete species peaked in October; a smaller peak was generally observed in June. Evenness was lowest in October. The number of species in the five 12-month periods varied between 46 and 56 (bridge) and 41 and 47 (mouth); over the entire period, 75 (bridge) and 70 (mouth) species were identified. Of these, 30 and 26, respectively, occurred in every period. The average ranks of the 12 dominant species (based on yearly conidium production) could be divided into two groups of no significant differences: ranks 1-7 (bridge) and 1-10 (mouth), respectively, and 2-12 (both sites). Monthly abundances of the 12 top-ranked species were examined for correlations. Significant correlations found in periods measuring between 1 and 4 years were rarely validated in subsequent periods.Key words: aquatic hyphomycetes, stream spora, annual and seasonal periodicity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".