MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A General Framework for Mixed-Domain Echo Cancellation in Discrete Multitone Systems

2013· article· en· W2041849117 on OpenAlexaff
Neda Ehtiati, Benoı̂t Champagne

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceToeplitz matrixAlgorithmEcho (communications protocol)Frequency domainMatrix decompositionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In full-duplex communication systems with discrete multi-tone (DMT) modulation, echo cancellers are employed to cancel echo by means of adaptive filters. Generally, the structure present in the DMT signals is used to decrease the computational complexity of these cancellers by splitting the operations between the time and frequency domains. In this work, we introduce a general framework for designing echo cancellers for such systems in an arbitrary mixed domain. This is achieved by introducing a generic decomposition of the Toeplitz data matrix at the transmitter in terms of arbitrary unitary matrices. Then, based on this decomposition, a new mixed-domain echo cancellation structure is derived, which performs an exact instantaneous gradient-type adaptation. This mixed-domain configuration is also extended for realizing constrained adaptation whereby linear constraints are used to ensure the proper mapping of the weight vectors in different domains. The proposed structures offer a unified framework to study existing cancellers and to design new ones with better performance measures. This framework is employed to propose a new canceller based on discrete trigonometric transformations. The analytical and numerical results presented show that this canceller has a faster convergence rate than the existing ones with similar complexity and is more robust.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207