The Mechanism of Hydrogen Formation Induced by Low-Energy Electron Irradiation of Hexadecanethiol Self-Assembled Monolayers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The desorption of molecular hydrogen during low-energy electron irradiation of self-assembled monolayers containing n-alkanethiols has been previously reported, yet to date, there is no consensus as to the mechanism for the formation of this ubiquitous product. In this study, mixed monolayers containing known ratios of perhydrogenated and perdeuterated alkanethiols were chemisorbed to Au(111)/mica substrates and used as targets for low-energy electron irradiation; by measuring the electron-stimulated production of H(2), D(2), and HD as a function of the film composition, we unambiguously show that the desorbing molecular hydrogen is formed via a two-step bimolecular reaction process. The initial electron-molecule scattering event produces a reactive atomic fragment, which then abstracts a hydrogen atom from a nearby molecular site to produce the measured bimolecular yields; the contribution of one-step unimolecular dissociation channels to the overall molecular hydrogen yields is below the approximately 5% detection limit. The dependence of the electron-induced modifications to the film on the incident electron energy suggests that the primary event is dissociative electron attachment, and that the primary reactive fragment is most likely H(-). Quantitative analysis of the product yields shows that while approximately 80% of the molecular hydrogen is formed by this bimolecular mechanism within the film, the remaining 20% is formed from reactive atomic fragments that are ejected from the film and subsequently react with residual H(2)O adsorbed on the chamber walls.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".