External cavity semiconductor laser model for the strong feedback regime
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We present a formalism describing the dynamics of a semiconductor diode and apply it to the study of the dynamics of external cavity lasers within the strong regime. The formalism is based upon the usual travelling wave phenomenological model for the field and carriers within the semiconductor gain medium. Since the non-radiative recombination time of the carriers is typically much longer than the diode round trip time, we use a multiple scales analysis to obtain a model much simpler in form than the travelling wave model, but as accurate, without assuming that the gain within the diode is uniform. We apply this model to the external cavity laser. Rather than including multiple external cavity reflections explicitly, we include all external cavity reflections through the introduction of a single additional feedback parameter and one extra term in the field equation. In the limit of a single external cavity reflection, our field equation reduces to a form of the well-known Lang–Kobayashi equation that describes very weak external feedback. For strong feedback, we examine both the steady state and dynamical laser properties such as small signal response and large signal current modulation. Acknowledgments This work has been supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Notes Current address: Department of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. Additional informationNotes on contributorsJ. E. Sipe Current address: Department of Physics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it