MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041924858 · doi:10.1063/1.4789752

Optical properties of SrTiO3 on silicon(100)

2013· article· en· W2041924858 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSiliconEpitaxyMaterials scienceEllipsometryMolecular beam epitaxyLayer (electronics)Amorphous solidOptoelectronicsAmorphous siliconThin filmNanotechnologyCrystalline siliconChemistryCrystallography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epitaxial buffer layers enable the many functionalities found in perovskites to be integrated with silicon. However, epitaxial growth of SrTiO3 on silicon is tricky and has so far only been achieved by molecular beam epitaxy. Nonetheless, previous investigations of these films were limited by the amorphous layer occurring at the interface. Through a combination of improved interface quality and an improved model, we report the optical properties of SrTiO3 films on Si(100) investigated by spectroscopic ellipsometry. We find that the data are best described by a model with two different SrTiO3 layers, potentially resulting from variations in the oxygen content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.728

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it