MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041943412

Penetrating Heart Injuries Due to Puncture by Fractured Sternum or Ribs Following Blunt Trauma

2011· article· en· W2041943412 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mahmut Tokur, Mehmet Ergin, Mehmet Okumuş, Can Kürkçüoğlu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Current Surgery · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma Management and Diagnosis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSternumMedicineRib cageThorax (insect anatomy)BluntPenetrating traumaSurgeryBlunt traumaPuncturingThoracic wallAnatomy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Penetrating heart injuries typically present as ruptured myocardium resulting from sharp edged or pointed weapons and firearms. Blunt trauma to the thorax may also cause myocardial rupture by squeezing the heart between the bony structures of the thorax. However, the penetrating trauma resulting from the free ends of the fractured sternum or the ribs puncturing the heart and rupturing the myocardium is seldom seen. In this study, we present two cases of penetrating heart trauma resulting from fractured sternum and ribs puncturing the myocardium following a blunt chest trauma. doi:10.4021/jcs104e

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Current SurgerySame topicTrauma Management and DiagnosisFrench-language works237,207