Scrutinizing the Nanostructural and Nanomechanical Features of Regenerated Cellulose Ultrafiltration Membranes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ultrafiltration (UF) membranes have been widely used for many separation processes in which high performance is required. Commercial regenerated cellulose UF membranes with variable molecular weight cut-offs were characterized by high performance atomic force microscopy (AFM) using the novel quantitative nanomechanical mapping mode and the versatility of its signal channels towards nanoscale features elucidation of the materials surface. In addition, Raman spectroscopy was applied in order to investigate some possible chemical behavior changes associated with the UF membranes’ cut-offs. Overall, the results showed that the proposed AFM method was reliable to gain qualitative and quantitative data at unprecedented nanoscale resolution and such information can be used to distinguish UF membranes according to their specific molecular weight cut-offs and properties even on situations in which the molecular behavior were not influenced by the UF membrane’ cut-off. This approach can be useful on quality control procedures of researchers and manufacturers producing or modifying these polymeric materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it