MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041950877 · doi:10.1109/icecs.2005.4633430

Fully integrated rectification and bin-integration analog circuit for biomedical signal processing

2005· article· en· W2041950877 on OpenAlexafffund
Adnan Harb, Mohamad Sawan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersCMC Microsystems
KeywordsCMOSAnalog signal processingRectifier (neural networks)IntegratorCapacitorSwitched capacitorSIGNAL (programming language)Electronic engineeringSignal processingSine waveComputer scienceElectrical engineeringIntegrated circuitBinBlock (permutation group theory)VoltageEngineeringDigital signal processingArtificial neural networkMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we describe the simulation and measurement results of a fully integrated low-voltage CMOS rectification and bin-integration (RBI) module based on switched-capacitor and dedicated to nerve signal (Electroneurogram) acquisition and processing. RBI is the most common signal processing function applied to the nerve signals and since the frequency of these signals is relatively low, switched-capacitor architecture has been used. The proposed device comprises a new always-valid output sample-and-hold block followed by a full wave rectifier and a three-stage bin-integrator. The integrated circuit has been realized in CMOS 0.35 mm technology. The design, simulation and measurement results of the proposed module are presented. At plusmn1.3 V supply, the device delivers an RBI error of less than -45 dB for a sine wave input of 7.2 kHz that is the main component of the nerve signal and an output dynamic range of plusmn1.1 V while dissipating 578 muW and occupying a silicon area of 5.83 mm2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207