MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041955174 · doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000000631

Modeling the Anesthetic Effect of Ropivacaine after a Femoral Nerve Block in Orthopedic Patients

2015· article· en· W2041955174 on OpenAlexafffund
François Gaudreault, Pierre Drolet, Michel Fallaha, France Varin

Bibliographic record

VenueAnesthesiology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Pain Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHealth Canada
KeywordsMedicineRopivacaineNONMEMAnesthesiaOrthopedic surgeryFemoral nervePopulationFemoral nerve blockPharmacodynamicsPharmacokineticsAnestheticNerve blockSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractAbstract A population pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic model was developed that describes the relationship between sensory response and the amount of ropivacaine remaining at the site of injection after single-dose injection for femoral nerve block. Simulation using the model suggests that following a bolus dose of 100 mg, 0.2% ropivacaine hydrochloride should be infused at least at 3 ml/h to maintain a complete sensory block for 48 h. Background: Even though ropivacaine is frequently used during orthopedic surgery, the relationship between plasma concentrations and degree of sensory anesthesia after a peripheral nerve block is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to characterize this relation using population pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic modeling. Methods: Femoral nerve block was performed by the anterior approach using a single injection (20 ml) of 0.5% ropivacaine hydrochloride in 20 patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia. Sensory thresholds in response to a gradual increase in transcutaneous electrical stimulation (primary endpoints), loss and recovery of ice-cold sensation, as well as total ropivacaine plasma concentrations were determined up to 4 days after administration of the local anesthetic. Using NONMEM (ICON, USA), sensory block was modeled by assuming an equilibration delay ( k e0 ) between amount in the depot and effect-site compartments. Results: Mean effect-site amount producing 90% of the maximum possible effect ( AE 90 ) was estimated as 20.2 mg. At 2 × AE 90 , the sigmoid E max model predicted a mean onset time of 23.4 min and mean duration of 22.9 h. Interindividual variability (IIV) for AE 50 was 49%. Typical k e0 half-life was 34.7 min (IIV = 52%) and steepness parameter 8.7 (IIV = 48%). None of the pharmacodynamic model parameters showed sex, age, or body weight dependency. Conclusions: A population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model was developed that quantitatively describes the sensory component of a femoral nerve block in orthopedic patients. Further clinical studies will be needed to validate the clinical relevance of this finding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.460

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnesthesiologySame topicAnesthesia and Pain ManagementFrench-language works237,207