MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041973799 · doi:10.1063/1.2772849

Formulation of magnetically perturbed time-dependent density functional theory

2007· article· en· W2041973799 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael Seth, Tom Ziegler

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsTime-dependent density functional theoryExcitationPhysicsPerturbation theory (quantum mechanics)Perturbation (astronomy)Statistical physicsDensity functional theoryQuantum electrodynamicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A formulation of time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) in the presence of a static imaginary perturbation is derived. A perturbational approach is applied leading to corrections to various orders in the quantities of interest, namely, the excitation energies and transition densities. The perturbed TDDFT equations are relatively straightforward to derive but the resulting expressions are rather cumbersome. Simplifications of these equations are suggested. Both the simplified and full expressions are used to obtain equations for first- and second-order corrections to the excitation energy, the first-order correction to the transition density, and the corrections for both quantities to first-order in two different perturbations. This formulation, called magnetically perturbed TDDFT, details how conventional TDDFT calculations can be corrected to allow for the inclusion of a static magnetic field and/or spin-orbit coupling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207