Data error covariance in matched-field geoacoustic inversion
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many approaches to geoacoustic inversion are based implicitly on the assumptions that data errors are Gaussian-distributed and spatially uncorrelated (i.e., have a diagonal covariance matrix). However, the latter assumption is often not valid due to theory errors, and can lead to reduced accuracy for geoacoustic parameter estimates and underestimation of parameter uncertainties. This paper examines the effects of data error (residual) covariance in matched-field geoacoustic inversion. An inversion approach is developed based on a nonparametric method of estimating the full covariance matrix (including off-diagonal terms) from the data residuals and explicitly including this covariance in the misfit function. Qualitative and quantitative statistical tests for Gaussianity and for correlations in complex residuals are considered to validate the inversion results. The approach is illustrated for Bayesian geoacoustic inversion of broadband, vertical-array acoustic data measured in the Mediterranean Sea.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it