MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2041985949 · doi:10.1080/13549839.2012.719016

Governmentality, environmental subjectivity, and urban intensification

2012· article· en· W2041985949 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueLocal Environment · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Planning and Governance
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernmentalityZoningCorporate governanceSustainabilityNeighbourhood (mathematics)GentrificationPoliticsUrban planningSociologyEnvironmental governanceEnvironmental planningPolitical sciencePublic administrationGeographyEconomic growthCivil engineeringEconomicsLawManagementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article delineates concepts of eco-modernisation and urban sustainability (including its associated discourses), elucidating Foucault's notion of governmentality and examining select moments of contested urban governance in the neighbourhood of Old Ottawa South, in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. It shows how intensification – a "compact city approach" to urban sustainability – as both policy and practice, serves to both discipline and regulate by "conducting the conduct" of environmental and entrepreneurial subjects. It reveals that zoning has more explicitly become a political technology (albeit a flexible one) for achieving "highest and best use" of private property, privileging intensification projects proposed by developers, through a hierarchical exercise of state power that privileges market processes, while undermining community values and priorities. Keywords: urban sustainabilityurban intensificationurban planningurban governancegovernmentality Notes In general, urban intensification refers to increased densities of residents and/or buildings within the so-called built-up urban areas, although it can also refer to increased economic activity in a particular area and has been connected to processes of gentrification (Campsie Citation1995, Bunce Citation2004, Dale and Newman Citation2009). The City of Ottawa (Citation2007a) defines brownfields as "abandoned, vacant, or underutilized commercial and industrial properties where past actions have resulted in actual or perceived environmental contamination and/or derelict or deteriorated buildings" (p. 3). According to City of Ottawa (Citation2006), a main street is "traditional" if the community through which it runs was developed primarily prior to 1945. These streets tend to have small-scale mixed-use buildings set close to the street, resulting in "a lively mix of uses and a pedestrian-friendly environment" (City of Ottawa Citation2006, p. 1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it