MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042007246 · doi:10.1242/jeb.056747

Margaret Clements, JEB Administrator, retires

2011· article· en· W2042007246 on OpenAlex
Kathryn Knight

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPleasureEditor in chiefMedicineHistoryManagementPsychologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anyone who has telephoned the Editorial Office of The Journal of Experimental Biology over the past 16 years will be familiar with the cheerful voice that answered, ‘Hello, JEB office,’ and then greeted familiar names with pleasure as it recognised the caller. That voice belongs to Margaret Clements, who welcomed authors as colleagues and friends and has dedicated much of the past two decades to the smooth running of the JEB peer review process. However, this long and happy association finally ended on 10 February 2011, when Margaret retired from her role as Senior Editorial Administrator.Although Margaret officially became the JEB administrator on 1 July 1994, she already had a long affiliation with the journal, which began in the 1970s while she was working as Secretary to John Treherne at the AFRC Unit of Invertebrate Chemistry and Physiology in Cambridge, UK. At the time, Treherne was the Editor of JEB and, when his journal administrator, Jean Wallis, was on holiday, Margaret temporarily stepped into her role to keep the journal running. In 1978, Treherne launched the annual JEB Symposia and invited Margaret to help run the first of these cross-disciplinary conferences – the subject of which was Cellular Oscillators – in Titisee, Germany. The symposium was such a success that this became the first of many JEB meetings that Margaret arranged annually in venues across Europe, America and Australia.Reminiscing about her early days with the journal, Margaret recalls that the JEB office was very different from what it is today, equipped only with an electronic typewriter and telephone. Authors submitted three printed copies of each manuscript ready for peer review. Jean and Margaret posted the manuscript to referees, accompanied by a letter inviting the recipient to review. She recalls that it could take anything up to 2 months for the first reviews to come in and says, ‘We even used to buy stamps and put them in with the package so that the referees could send it back.’By the time that Margaret became the full-time JEB administrator in 1994, Charlie Ellington had replaced Treherne as Editor and had recently been joined by a new Editor, Bob Boutilier. In the interim, the office had acquired an IBM computer to log manuscripts and an electric typewriter with a few standard letter templates that Margaret could personalise. After Ellington stepped down later in 1994, Margaret continued working closely with Boutilier, communicating with the ever-growing international team of Editors that he recruited. In addition to allocating manuscripts to the team of editors, Margaret also corresponded on Boutilier's behalf with the authors and referees of manuscripts that he had assigned himself. ‘I used to print out manuscripts and prepare folders for Bob and he'd go through and personalise the letters that I was going to send out,’ explains Margaret.In the following years, the office continued modernising, introducing email and eventually online manuscript submission. However, in 2003, Boutilier's health began to fail. ‘Before he went into hospital I was going to visit him every other night in Sydney Sussex College with manuscripts. That was the time I managed to persuade him we could do a lot of our communication by email,’ recalls Margaret. Then, in September 2003, Boutilier became dangerously ill and appointed Hans Hoppeler and Peter Lutz as joint Deputy Editors. During the time of Boutilier's final illness, Margaret worked closely with Hoppeler and Lutz to keep the peer review system running seamlessly while visiting Boutilier in hospital and keeping his family back in Canada informed of his condition.After Boutilier's death in December 2003, Margaret continued working with Hoppeler and Lutz until Hoppeler was appointed as the journal's 6th Editor-in-Chief in August 2004. By now, The Company of Biologists was beginning to investigate alternative systems to keep track of manuscripts in all three of its journals and, in 2006, rolled out a new bespoke web-based manuscript trafficking system that would allow authors, editors and referees to track the progress of manuscripts through peer review from anywhere in the world.Over the years, Margaret has developed strong connections with the Community that publishes in the journal. She became a familiar face on the JEB stand at The Society of Experimental Biologists annual meeting and has shepherded many young scientists through their travelling fellowship applications. Thinking about the scientists that she has corresponded with, Margaret says, ‘I'm interested in what they're doing and I still like to look at the abstracts so that I can get a rough idea about the work. I have a small knowledge, but JEB's subject area is so wide. I think that's what has made the job so enjoyable for me.’Margaret has also worked closely with all of the Editors at the journal and says, ‘I have been lucky to work with four great Editors-in-Chief and the rest of the Editorial team’. Reflecting on Margaret as a colleague, Hoppeler says, ‘She has introduced me to the duties and joys of being an Editor; she has always kindly reminded me when something was in danger of going amiss or being forgotten and she is probably the best source of information about people working in the field of Comparative Physiology. I will miss the personal touch that Margaret brought to her day to day work with authors, referees and Editors.’While we send Margaret our very best wishes for a long and fulfilling retirement, we also extend a warm welcome to Sue Chamberlain, who has taken over Margaret's responsibilities as Senior Editorial Administrator. Sue has many years of publishing experience, having been an Editorial Administrator on our sister journal, the Journal of Cell Science, since 2005, and she is excited by the new opportunities and challenges that lie ahead in her new role at the JEB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it