Alcan et le « partenalisme » : les mutations d'un modèle de responsabilité sociale au cours du XXe siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé La littérature sur la RSE conçoit encore trop souvent l’interface entre l’entreprise et son environnement comme une simple relation de pouvoir où l’une des parties domine nécessairement l’autre. L’analyse longitudinale de la relation entre Alcan et sa collectivité d’accueil dans le nord québécois contredit cette perspective. L’entreprise y a développé au fil du temps un modèle original, que nous avons baptisé « paRTenalisme ». Centré sur le concept de « durabilité », ce modèle prend la forme d’une convention évolutive entre la firme et ses parties prenantes. Il consiste à maintenir un équilibre permanent entre la participation soutenue de l’entreprise à de nouvelles collaborations locales et la préservation de son autonomie. Ce modèle émergent nous invite à repenser la RSE à partir d’une perspective socio-constructionniste.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".