Le développement de la sociologie de la santé au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il y a dix ans, on aurait rarement assisté chez-nous à une confrontation entre un sociologue et un médecin sur quelque panel télévisé ou encore relevé la signature du sociologue au bas d'une recherche portant sur l'univers des soins. Ce ne sont plus aujourd'hui des événements d'exception. Le sociologue québécois prétend à ses lettres de créance dans l'étude scientifique de la santé. Malgré des résistances plus ou moins vives, il trace son chemin dans cette voie en soumettant une quantité croissante de contributions originales. Mais quelles sont les origines historiques et idéologiques de la sociologie de la santé au Québec? Comment le sociologue fut-il amené à figurer sur cette scène à la fois complexe et délicate qu'est la santé? Quel est l'éventail de ses tâches actuelles?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".