MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042016554 · doi:10.1119/1.1485715

A Newton–Faraday approach to electromagnetic energy and angular momentum storage in an electromechanical system

2002· article· en· W2042016554 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicExperimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of CanadaRoyal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMoment of inertiaClassical mechanicsAngular momentumFaraday cageElectromagnetic fieldKinetic energyMomentum (technical analysis)Mechanical energyInertiaDynamics (music)Field (mathematics)Magnetic fieldMechanicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dynamical behavior of a simple rotating mechanical system that carries a charge on its surface and is accelerated by a falling mass is considered. It is shown that a fraction of the total kinetic energy is missing and that exactly this fraction of energy has been stored in the magnetic field distribution. The conservation of electromagnetic angular momentum is also discussed on the same basis. The concept of an electromagnetic moment of inertia is introduced to establish a close parallel with the concept of mechanical moment of inertia in classical dynamics. It is suggested that the present mechanical system can be used as a teaching tool at the early-to-intermediate level of an undergraduate physics program to ease the transition from the dynamics of rigid bodies to that of more abstract fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.696

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it