MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042038294 · doi:10.1021/jp0348070

Stabilization of an Unusual Tautomer of Guanine:  Photoionization of Al−Guanine and Al−Guanine−(NH<sub>3</sub>)<i><sub>n</sub></i>

2003· article· en· W2042038294 on OpenAlexaff
David Bue Pedersen, Benoît Simard, Ana Martı́nez, Anastassiia Moussatova

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsSteacie Institute for Molecular Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGuaninePhotoionizationTautomerChemistryIonizationIonization energyRing (chemistry)Computational chemistryCrystallographyStereochemistryIonOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photoionization efficiency spectra of gas-phase Al−guanine−(NH 3 ) n, 0 ≤ n ≤ 2, have been measured in the 210−270 nm range. Within error the ionization energies, 4.65 ± 0.08, 4.6 ± 0.1, and 4.5 ± 0.2 eV for n = 0, 1, and 2, respectively, are equivalent. This result is explained in terms of molecular geometries in which NH 3 associates with the guanine constituent of Al−guanine specifically. The onset of signal in the Al−guanine photoionization efficiency spectrum is found to shift from 5.6 ± 0.1 to 4.65 ± 0.08 eV upon introduction of NH 3 to the He carrier gas. The shift is indicative of formation of vastly different amounts of distinct isomers of Al−guanine in the presence or absence of NH 3 . The geometries, ionization energies, and heats of formation of the isomers have been determined using DFT calculations benchmarked against the experimental ionization energies. The most stable isomer is one of an Al atom complexed to an unusual tautomer of guanine in which, effectively, a proton has been transferred from the six-membered ring to the five-membered ring. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of the existence of this tautomer of guanine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207