MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042039498 · doi:10.1029/2004eo060001

Drilling probes past carbon cycle perturbations on the Demerara Rise

2004· article· en· W2042039498 on OpenAlexaff
Jochen Erbacher, D. Mosher, Mitchell J Malone

Bibliographic record

VenueEos · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
FundersOklahoma Agricultural Experiment StationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGeologyCretaceousPaleontologyOceanographyDrillingEscarpmentCenozoicStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) Leg 207 recently cored sediments on the Demerara Rise at ∼9°N in the tropical Atlantic and successfully recovered continuous records of the Paleocene/Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM), the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary (K/T), and Cretaceous Ocean Anoxic Events (OAEs). The Demerara Rise, north of Suriname and French Guyana, South America, is an ideal drilling target because expanded sections of Cretaceous‐ and Paleogene‐age deep‐sea sediments are shallowly buried and exist with good stratigraphic control in expanded sections. Furthermore, the northwestern escarpment of the Demerara Rise offered the possibility of recovering sediments along a paleo‐depth transect. The paleogeographic position of the Demerara Rise lies within the core of the tropics in a location near the Equatorial Atlantic Gateway between South America and Africa, which is believed to have played an important role in controlling changes in global climate during the Cretaceous.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEosSame topicGeological and Geophysical StudiesFrench-language works237,207