MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042079822 · doi:10.1002/cjce.20593

Surface immobilisation of fluorinated polystyrene‐acrylate latex nanoparticles with core–shell structure by crosslinking

2011· article· en· W2042079822 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Guilong Xu, Yun Liang, Xiufang Wen, Peng Pi, Dafeng Zheng, Jun Cheng, Zhiyu Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province
KeywordsCopolymerAcrylateMaterials scienceX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyPolystyreneFourier transform infrared spectroscopyEmulsion polymerizationPolymer chemistryEmulsionChemical engineeringContact angleSiloxaneButyl acrylateNanoparticleMonomerComposite materialPolymerNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Fluorinated polystyrene‐acrylate (PSA) latex nanoparticles with core–shell structure were synthesised by two‐stage seeded emulsion polymerisation method in the presence of reactive emulsifier DNS‐86. Diallyl phthalate (DAP) and Vinyltriethoxysilicone (VTES) were used as crosslinking agent to immobilise the fluorinated copolymer on the surface of the latex film. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra show that fluorine and siloxane monomers were effectively involved in the emulsion copolymerisation. Transmission electron microscope (TEM) observation shows that the prepared emulsion particles had a core–shell structure with fluorinated copolymer in the shell. X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis reveals that fluorine atom has the tendency of migrating to the film–air interface and the incorporation of VTES helps the migration of fluorine atom towards the film–air interface. Water contact angle (WCA) test proved that DAP and VTES as crosslinking agent can immobilise the fluorinated copolymer on the surface of the latex films. © 2011 Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.371

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207