Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Analyse causale et récits de vie Un des objectifs de cette étude est de contribuer au développement de la réflexion théorique sur l'analyse causale dans les recherches qualitatives et. par ricochet, à l'élucidation de la problématique de la causalité en sciences sociales. L'auteur restitue à l'expression " analyse causale " l'acception large que lui avait donnée Weber. La réflexion méthodologique a comme point d'ancrage deux recherches avec des récits de vie dans le domaine de la sociologie du droit pénal. L'auteur traite du rôle des questions paradigmatiques dans l'analyse causale et indique deux cheminements possibles pour l'imputation causale. Il propose la distinction entre les effets de premier et de deuxième ordre et soulève la question du statut théorico-méthodologique des effets dans les recherches qualitatives. Enfin, il offre une solution structurale à la logique de la causalité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.127 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it