Toward the Development of New Textile/Plastic Electrochromic Cells Using Triphenylamine-Based Copolymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report the preparation and characterization of new electrochromic polymers containing a 4-butyltriphenylamine (BuTPA) unit on the main chain. All polymers were obtained through the Suzuki−Miyaura cross-coupling reaction between 4-butyl- N, N -bis((4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolan-4-phenyl)aniline) and several aryl dibromide molecules to modulate the electronic properties of the resulting copolymers. 2,5-Dibromothiophene, 2,5-dibromo(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene), 3,6-dibromo- N -octylcarbazole, bis(6-bromo- N -octylcarbazol-3-yl), and 2,7-dibromo-3,6-dimethoxy-9,9-dihexylfluorene were used as comonomers and led to five new copolymers, PT(BuTPA), PE(BuTPA), PC(BuTPA), PCC(BuTPA), and PF(BuTPA). These polymers are readily soluble in many common organic solvents, which make them suitable for spray-coating film deposition. Electrochromic cells with the following configuration were assembled: ITO-coated glass or plastic/electrochromic polymer/gel electrolyte/ITO-coated glass or plastic or conducting textile. These copolymers exhibit good optical and electrochemical properties for military camouflage needs with color transition from pale yellow to green, transparent to khaki, or pale green to reddish-brown. Electrochemistry, spectroelectrochemistry, and colorimetric measurements of the devices were examined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".