MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042128965 · doi:10.1139/l05-050

Modeling incremental pavement roughness using functional network

2005· article· en· W2042128965 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nii Attoh-Okine

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of DelawareUniversity of Delaware Research Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial neural networkPavement managementFunctional requirementSurface finishSet (abstract data type)Machine learningEngineeringCivil engineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Incremental roughness prediction is a critical component of decision making of any pavement management systems, therefore, proper estimation is of paramount importance. This paper presents the application of functional equations and networks to incremental roughness prediction of flexible pavement. In the functional networks, neuron functions are multivariate and multiargumentative. Functional equations form the basis of functional networks, therefore, established theorem in functional equations are easily applicable in the analysis. The model is developed from validated set of incremental and interactive pavement distress functions in the highway design and maintenance standard models (HDM). The models proposed and developed are intended for use in infrastructure management (pavement) applications and as a performance model for pavement design. The paper presents a computational procedure of the functional network using the serial associative functional network. The functional equation and networks approach use the domain knowledge and data for developing the roughness models.Key words: pavement roughness, functional equation, functional networks, neural networks, pavement management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score0.879

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicNeural Networks and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207