MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Optical and Scintillation Properties of Cr Doped Y<sub>3</sub>Ga<sub>5</sub>O<sub>12</sub> Crystal for Infra-Red Scintillators

2014· article· en· W2042173839 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKey engineering materials · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsHatch (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadioluminescencePhotoluminescenceScintillatorScintillationMaterials scienceDopingCrystal (programming language)Analytical Chemistry (journal)WavelengthNuclear chemistryMineralogyCrystallographyPhysicsOpticsOptoelectronicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We evaluated optical and scintillation properties of a Cr 0.5%:Y 3 Ga 5 O 12 (YGG) and Cr 0.5%:Y 3 Al 5 O 12 (YAG) crystals grown by the micro-pulling down method for infrared emission scintillators. In the photoluminescence and X-ray induced radioluminescence measurements, the emissions peaks of Cr:YGG were located in the longer wavelength than those of Cr:YAG. Radioluminescene spectrum of Cr:YGG had a broad peak at 716 nm related to Cr 3+ 2 E→ 4 A 2 and 4 T→ 4 A 2 transitions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it