Effects of Glomus lamellosum on Growth, Essential Oil Production and Nutrients Uptake in Selected Medicinal Plants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of Glomus lamellosum on root colonization, growth, essential oil production and composition and nutrient acquisition of Santolina chamaecyparissus, Salvia officinalis, Lavandula angustifolia, Geranium dissectum, and Origanum dictamnus was investigated. The results showed that mycorrhizal plants had significantly higher growth, essential oil production and nutrient contents compared to non-inoculated plants. The S. officinalis plants showed the highest percentage of colonization, while the S. chamaecyparissus the lowest. Similar percentage of colonization was found among the G. dissectum, L. angustifolia and O. dictamnus plants. Analysis of essential oil by GC and GC/MS showed that the effect of G. lamellosum on the main compounds in leaf essential oils was different on the plant species used. It is concluded that the use of Glomus lamellosum may allow plant growth in low fertility soils, reduce fertilizer inputs and increase aromatic plant production of essential oils, while they indicate that it may be possible to use mycorrhizae to affect the quality of the essential oil produced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".