MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042277620 · doi:10.4043/23767-ms

Seismic Imaging of Gas Hydrate Accumulations Beneath Thick Permafrost Areas of the Mackenzie Delta, NWT, Canada

2012· article· en· W2042277620 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gilles Bellefleur, Michael Riedel, T A Brent

Bibliographic record

VenueOTC Arctic Technology Conference · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
FundersNorthwestern University
KeywordsClathrate hydratePermafrostGeologyDeltaSubmarine pipelineBoreholeNatural gasWell loggingGeomorphologySaturation (graph theory)River deltaHydrateGeochemistryPetrologyPaleontologyPetroleum engineeringOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Mackenzie Delta in Canada's Northwest Territories hosts manypermafrost-related gas hydrate accumulations that were indirectly discovered orinferred from conventional hydrocarbon exploration programs. In particular, gashydrate intervals characterized with high saturation show high resistivity andhigh P- and S-wave velocity on well-log data, and are typically found insand-rich horizons. As demonstrated at the Mallik site, the velocity contrastbetween highly saturated gas hydrate-bearing sediments and unconsolidatedwater-bearing sediments is significant and allows their detection with seismicdata. Here, we use 2D and 3D seismic reflection data acquired by industry onRichards Island to map and characterize gas hydrate accumulations beneath athick permafrost area of the Mackenzie Delta. Specifically, we show new seismicevidences of gas hydrate accumulations near YaYa, Ivik and Umiak. The presenceof gas hydrate was previously inferred from well-log data in several boreholeslocated in those areas. All seismic data were re-processed following anAVO-friendly flow that preserved relative amplitude relationships. On suchdata, the strong acoustic impedance of gas hydrate produces strong amplitudeseismic reflections. The seismic signature of gas hydrates is confirmed byseismic-to-well correlation in areas where boreholes are available. Resultsindicate that gas hydrate accumulations occur in structurally-controlled playstypical of conventional oil and gas traps found in this area, and furtherdemonstrate that gas hydrates are part of the regional petroleum system. Introduction Gas hydrates located offshore and onshore beneath thick permafrost areasconstitute one of the largest untapped natural gas resources. Most known gashydrate occurrences in the Mackenzie Delta and submarine permafrost areas ofthe Beaufort Sea were discovered or inferred indirectly in wells drilled forconventional hydrocarbon exploration. Well-log data intersecting gas hydratesshow the typical high resistivity and high P-wave velocity signature associatedwith relatively porous hydrate-bearing sandstone. Progress made in the lastdecade has shown that gas hydrates can also be mapped using seismic reflectiondata. The acoustic impedance contrast between non-hydrate and hydrate-bearingsediments usually produces strong amplitude reflections on seismic data. Such asignature was previously observed onshore at Mallik, Northwestern Territories(Collett et al., 1999), and on the North Slope of Alaska (Collett et al.,2011). In addition to mapping, gas hydrate saturations were also estimated fromseismic data where well-logging data are available for calibration (Riedel etal., 2009).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOTC Arctic Technology ConferenceSame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207