Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spoiler alert--this review gives away plot twists for What Richard Did, Herman Koch's novel Dinner (2012) and Christos Tsiolkas' novel Slap (2008). Lenny Abrahamson's third feature is something of a departure from dark, low-key comedy of Adam and Paul and mournful, quasi-spiritual tone and tenor of Garage. Interestingly, director also shifts his focus from male characters more frequently understood as problem social categories than actual people (drug users, marginalised rural men) to a social milieu in which privileges of white, middleclass masculinity are entirely taken for granted. What Richard Did is based on Kevin Power's 2008 novel Bad Day in Blackrock which was, in turn, inspired by Brian Murphy case, in which an 18-year old boy was beaten and kicked to death by school friends outside a Dublin nightclub in August 2000. Reviews of What Richard Did were overwhelmingly positive in both Irish and British press, and it recently won five IFTA awards out of a total of 10 nominations, including Best Film, Best Director, Best Script (Malcolm Campbell) and Best Actor (Jack Reynor). Set in an affluent Dublin suburb, story begins with somewhat mundane adventures of 'super-rich' kid Richard Karlsen and his friends in summer between finishing school and starting university. When a fight with Conor, Richard's rival for Lara's affections, ends with former beaten and left to die alone on street, however, Richard's moral universe begins to implode as it gradually dawns on him that there will be no punishment or repercussions for what he did. On contrary, his father and friends immediately move to cover up for him, and he is packed off to family beach house until whole incident blows over. There Richard is left confused and rudderless to contemplate future which his parents are so desperate to protect. film has been read as both indexing and allegorising moral nirvana of post-Celtic Tiger era. Sight and Sound reviewer Hannah McGill points out that, The sole offer of help comes to Richard from his Danish father (Denmark helped to bail Ireland out with a 400 [euro] million bilateral loan in 2010), also commenting that, the film frames this approach not as a reliable lifeline but as temptation to retreat further from hope; Richard's father doesn't help him to do right thing but encourages him to sidestep justice. (1) Indeed, it may well be Abrahamson's adroit allegorical framing of financial crisis not just as economic or local but also as moral and universal that explains film's resonance with audiences both within and beyond Ireland. In this sense, What Richard Did displays significant continuities with a particular sub-genre within both cinema and literature that is concerned with emotional aftermath of and middle-class response to ostensibly random acts of male violence, including Dutch author Herman Koch's best-selling novel Dinner (2012), Lionel Shriver's We Need to Talk About Kevin (2003), Christos Tsiolkas Slap (2008) and Christopher Wakling's What I Did (2011). Much of reviewer commentary around these novels and their filmic/TV adaptations has tended to focus on dynamics of middle class (post)modern family and questions of liberal parenting and political correctness. Like Slap (2008) and Dinner (2012), What Richard Did is preoccupied with moral crises experienced by characters after event rather than with their motivations. And, like Slap and Dinner, it is also a scathing critique of middle-class morality, which shows a level of self-interest and individualism among bourgeoisie that is practically indistinguishable from pre-democratic feudalism. In this neoliberal scenario, intersectional politics and group solidarity effectively disintegrate when interests of nuclear family--and by extension neoliberal capitalism--are threatened. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".