MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042322826 · doi:10.1139/v04-144

A novel crown ether generation containing the pyrilium heteroaromatic cation Synthesis, characterization, and solid-phase <sup>13</sup>C NMR

2004· article· en· W2042322826 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ali Moghimi, Majid Faal Rastegar, Mehdi Ghandi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Sensors
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Tehran
KeywordsChemistryCrown etherNMR spectra databaseNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyEtherCrystallographyPhase (matter)Carbon-13 NMRMass spectrumProton NMRStereochemistryOrganic chemistrySpectral lineIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The synthesis and structural characterization of two members, 5 and 6, of a novel generation of crown ethers containing the pyrilium cation are reported. These two compounds contain two and three benzo-9-crown-3 (B9C3) units, respectively, connected to the 2 and 6 or 2, 4, and 6 positions of a central pyrilium cation. The crown ethers 5 and 6 were obtained from the condensation reaction of appropriate aldehydes and methyl ketones in the presence of POCl 3 . A variety of physicochemical methods including electrospray mass spectroscopy, solution 1 H and 13 C NMR, and solid-phase 13 C NMR were applied for structural characterization. The 1 H and 13 C NMR studies indicate rapid rotation of the B9C3 unit about the C–C bond that connects the two units to each other. The solid-phase 13 C NMR spectra of these two crown ethers reveal that there are deviations from planarity for the two phenyl rings attached at the 2 and 6 positions of the central pyrilium cation.Key words: crown ether, pyrilium, solid-phase NMR, crownpyrilium, heteroaromatic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsFrench-language works237,207