Specific aminopeptidases of excised human nasal epithelium and primary culture: a comparison of functional characteristics and gene transcripts expression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether growing human nasal epithelium as primary cultures alters aminopeptidase B (APB), aminopeptidase N (APN) and dipeptidyldipeptidase (DPPIV) metabolic characteristics, and mRNA gene transcript expression. METHODS: The formation of 7-amino-methyl coumarin from specific substrates for APN (L-alanine-4-methyl-coumaryl-7-amide, APB (L-arginine-4-methyl-coumaryl-7-amide) and DPPIV (glycyl-L-proline-4-methyl-coumaryl-7-amide) was used to estimate the KM, Vmax and the effect of aminopeptidases inhibitors on the enzymes. Polymerase chain reaction was used to investigate gene expression. KEY FINDINGS: Results of this study showed that: (1) both the excised tissues and primary cultures of human nasal epithelium expressed APN, APB and DPPIV activity; (2) the KM of APB, APN and DPPIV was not significantly different in cell and tissue homogenates; (3) except for APN, the Vmax was not significantly different in the two metabolism models; (4) there was no statistically significant difference in the behaviours of APB, APN and DPPIV in response to inhibition by puromycin and bestatin in the two models; (5) the mRNA transcripts that encode APB, APN and DPPIV were expressed in both cell culture and tissue homogenate. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this study, it may be concluded that nasal primary culture system is suitable for investigating peptide and protein metabolism and enzymatic stability in human nasal epithelium. Except for APN, the tissue culture conditions did not significantly alter the functional and molecular expression of the aminopeptidases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".