MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042371223 · doi:10.1080/13855140412331336179

Supersonic Detonation in Rock Mass - Part 2: Particle Displacements and Velocity Fields for Single and Multiple Non-Delayed and Delayed Detonating Blastholes

2004· article· en· W2042371223 on OpenAlexaff
H. P. Roßmanith, N. Kouzniak

Bibliographic record

VenueFragblast · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and Detonation Processes
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsDetonationSupersonic speedMechanicsParticle velocityParticle (ecology)Rock mass classificationGeotechnical engineeringGeologyExplosive materialPhysicsHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Part 1 of this contribution [1] constant speed supersonic detonation of an infinitely long column charge and the resulting stress wave propagating from the blasthole were addressed and an analytical solution for the stress field was presented. This publication (Part 2) deals with the associated distributions of particle displacements and velocities using previously obtained results. The wave field in the immediate vicinity of multiple non-delayed and delayed detonating blastholes is discussed. Results show that the wave fronts decay with different decay coefficients for the P- and S-wave and these decay coefficients depend primarily on the velocity of detonation. Regions of large concentrations of stress and particle velocity could be identified in the regions adjacent to the blastholes as well as between the blastholes. These regions are indicative of material crushing and tensile failure. The wave field scenario is discussed for two, three and four delayed blastholes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFragblastSame topicCombustion and Detonation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207