MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042384303 · doi:10.1080/01431160512331316423

Remote sensing of chemical vapours by differential FTIR radiometry

2005· article· en· W2042384303 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jean‐Marc Thériault, Eldon Puckrin

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Remote Sensing · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
FundersDefence Research and Development Canada
KeywordsVapoursRemote sensingInterferometryEnvironmental scienceRadiometryRadiometerTrace gasFourier transform infrared spectroscopyOpticsInfraredSpectrometerMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)PhysicsChemistryMeteorologyGeologyEnvironmental chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel method for the passive remote sensing of chemical vapours by differential radiometry. The originality of the method lies in the use of a double‐input beam Fourier‐transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer optimized for optical subtraction. A description of the interferometer (compact atmospheric sounding interferometer (CATSI)) is given along with the detection algorithm (gaseous emission monitoring algorithm (GASEM)) that controls the interferometer data acquisition and performs the on‐line monitoring of chemical vapour parameters. The differential detection method has been successfully tested for several chemical vapours over distances of several hundred metres during open‐air experiments held at Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC)—Valcartier and Ft Riley, Kansas. In particular, the detection method has been used to map the integrated concentration (column amount) and the temperature of a plume of methanol vapour. In this case, the uncertainties in the methanol plume parameters have been estimated to be of the order of 15–30% for the column amount, and 2–5 K for the gas temperature, which represents an acceptable result for this type of passive remote sensing. The technique has been applied to ammonia vapours and binary mixtures of the two gases as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score0.711

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Remote SensingSame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207