MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042396122 · doi:10.1080/21642583.2014.883339

Finite-horizon<i>H</i><sub>∞</sub>filtering for time-varying delay systems with randomly varying nonlinearities and sensor saturations

2014· article· en· W2042396122 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSystems Science & Control Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Victoria
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)HorizonMathematicsComputer scienceGeometryArtificial intelligenceControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper mainly focuses on the H∞ filtering problem for a class of discrete time-varying systems with delays and randomly varying nonlinearities and sensor saturations. Two sets of binary switching sequences taking values of 1 and 0 are introduced to account for the stochastic phenomena of nonlinearities and sensor saturations which occur and influence the dynamics of the system in a probabilistic way. To further reflect the realities of transmission failure in the measurement, missing observation case is also considered simultaneously. By appropriately constructing a time-varying Lyapunov function and utilizing the stochastic analysis technique, sufficient criteria are presented in terms of a set of recursive linear matrix inequalities (RLMIs) under which the filtering error dynamics achieves the prescribed H∞ performance over a finite horizon. Moreover, at each time point k, the time-varying filter parameters can be solved iteratively according to the explicit solutions of the RLMIs. Finally, a numerical simulation is exploited to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed filter design scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it