MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Testing and Modeling of a New Moment Connection of Concrete-Filled FRP Tubes to Footings under Monotonic and Cyclic Loadings

2010· article· en· W2042403859 on OpenAlexafffund
Pedram Sadeghian, Yu Ching Lai, Amir Fam

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Composites for Construction · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsGovernment of OntarioCystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics
KeywordsStub (electronics)Structural engineeringMaterials scienceFibre-reinforced plasticComposite materialFlexural strengthFailure mode and effects analysisEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study explores a new moment connection of concrete-filled fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) tube (CFFT) to concrete footing. The tube is tightly fitted and adhesively bonded to a short reinforced concrete stub protruding from the footing, which facilitates concrete filling of the tube without the need for shoring. To establish the critical stub length (Xcr), specimens with heavily steel-reinforced stubs varying in length from 0.5D to 2.0D, where D = diameter of the CFFT, were fabricated and tested in flexure by using a cantilever setup. The Xcr required to achieve flexural failure of the CFFT was 1.05D. Additional specimens with a sufficient stub length of 1.5D were then fabricated to examine the effect on strength and ductility of the steel reinforcement ratio (ρs) in the stub. The optimal ρs of the stub required for the CFFT to reach flexural failure was 3.2%. Finally, the effect of low-cycle reversed bending fatigue was studied with and without an axial compression load. Remarkable ductility associated with the formation of a plastic hinge was observed at ρs of 2%. An analytical model capable of predicting (1) moment capacity of the connection, (2) whether failure is governed by flexure or bond, and (3) Xcr was developed and validated. It was then used in a parametric study to explore the effects of CFFT mechanical and geometric properties on Xcr.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score0.578

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Composites for ConstructionSame topicStructural Behavior of Reinforced ConcreteFrench-language works237,207