MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Continuity and Discontinuity in the Post‐Roman Economy

2006· article· en· W2042432009 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Sarris

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agrarian Change · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeasantEmpireAgrarian societyAutonomyRoman EmpireEconomyPower (physics)ReinterpretationLate AntiquityHistoryEconomicsSociologyAncient historyAgricultureArchaeologyPolitical scienceArtLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Framing the Early Middle Ages: Europe and the Mediterranean, 400–800 , Chris Wickham provides a compelling analysis of the impact of the fragmentation of the Roman Empire on state structures, social relations and economic systems. Those social classes and regional economies that were the most profoundly integrated into the trans‐regional imperial framework suffered the greatest degree of dislocation. In most regions the period 400–800 was associated with a localization and weakening of aristocratic power and a relative increase in peasant autonomy. In the archaeological record this process is discernible through the evidence for a simplification of patterns of production and exchange, as more sophisticated exchange networks, Wickham argues, were typically catalysed and sustained by aristocratic demand. This article suggests, however, that Wickham has perhaps understated the importance of demographic factors in the shifting balance of power between peasants and aristocrats, and, in certain instances, overstates the degree of discontinuity between the late Roman period and the early medieval in terms of agrarian relations of production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.850
Threshold uncertainty score0.542

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agrarian ChangeSame topicMedieval Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207