MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042437643 · doi:10.4296/cwrj2804531

Climate Change in Coastal British Columbia — A Paleoenvironmental Perspective

2003· article· en· W2042437643 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Ian R. Walker, Marlow G. Pellatt

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriques · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGovernment of Canada
KeywordsGlacial periodHoloceneInterglacialPhysical geographyClimate changeGeologyOceanographyGlacial lakePleistocenePrecipitationHolocene climatic optimumClimatologyGeographyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A comprehensive review of paleoenvironmental data provides the basis for evaluating natural climate variability in southwestern British Columbia. Key indicators of past changes include paleolimnological, paleobotanical, glaciological and dendroclimatological evidence. Lacustrine sediments record the rapid transition from a glacial to an interglacial climate 12,500 to 9000 14C yr BP. Peak summer temperatures (about 3 °C warmer than present) and minimum precipitation were recorded ca. 9000 to 7000 14C yr BP, but were likely accompanied by winter temperatures colder than today. Mid-Holocene cooling appears to have occurred sooner on the coast of British Columbia (~ 5000 14C yr BP) than in the southern interior where summer temperatures gradually declined ca. 7000 to 3000 14C yr BP, as wetter conditions and a stronger Aleutian low developed. Many glacial advances have been recorded in the past 3500 years, with most glacial maxima dating to the mid 19th century. A general glacial retreat has accompanied recent warming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2003
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Water Resources Journal / Revue canadienne des ressources hydriquesSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207