Digital Strategies of Consumer Involvement and Innovation Dynamics: A Cross-Sector Explorative Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study aims at exploring the collaborative dynamics between firms and consumers through Web tools. Atpresent, there is limited empirical research aimed at investigating if and how the involvement of consumers inthe implementation of open approaches, mediated by digital technologies, is actually implemented. The studypresents a recent multifactorial investigation of the topic where literature lacks in. Through the Web-analysis ofpractices of a sample group of 180 companies operating in different market sectors, the author wants to explorespread and type profiles of collaborative strategies, investigating the existence of a possible correlation with theserved markets and other moderator variables. Findings, identifying a ‘spectrum’ of engagement and co-creationmechanisms, suggest forms of aggregation and profiling in the approach followed by the firms and illustrate howthe characteristics of virtual spaces allow them to explore new frontiers in the implementation of openapproaches, with different degrees of involvement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it