L'anthropologie de la clinique dans le domaine de la santé mentale au Québec. Quelques repères historiques et leurs cadres institutionnels, 1950-1990
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'anthropologie de la clinique dans le domaine de la santé mentale au Québec Quelques repères historiques et leurs cadres institutionnels, 1950-1990 L'auteur établit, en premier lieu, les différences qui existent entre une anthropologie clinique (d'application) et une anthropologie de la clinique (fondamentale). Il bâtit ensuite, pour ce dernier type d'anthropologie, un profil des études sur les aspects psychosociaux et culturels de la santé mentale sur une période de 40 ans en ayant soin de les situer dans des contextes historiques et des cadres institutionnels. L'esquisse générale est fondée sur cinq pièces maîtresses, chacune ayant ses caractéristiques propres et contribuant d'une manière spécifique à l'enrichissement des perspectives théoriques et au raffinement des méthodologies et instrumentations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".